GenAI’s future in higher education: scenarios and evolution

The integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) into higher education is a rapidly evolving area, with many sources predicting a significant transformation of educational landscapes over the next five to ten years.

One expected scenario is the continued technological advancement and integration of GenAI into academic settings. The functionalities of GenAI are projected to expand quickly, including improvements in language understanding, multimodal processing, and task-specific fine-tuning, with models like GPT-5 anticipated in the near future. As these tools evolve, they will become a central component of modern teaching and learning—moving beyond theoretical discussions and becoming embedded in standard educational applications and systems. This shift will extend to diverse fields, not just programming, but also mathematics, engineering, and non-STEM subjects, where interactive learning tools will enhance educational practices.

Alongside these developments, GenAI will further personalise learning experiences by adapting content to individual students’ needs and learning styles. This includes providing real-time feedback and tailored materials based on student performance and preferences. GenAI will play a vital role in simplifying complex concepts, enabling deeper understanding, and fostering more profound knowledge acquisition, especially in disciplines like business. Its interactive and adaptive capabilities are expected to significantly boost student engagement and motivation. As GenAI becomes more integrated into education, new learning outcomes will emerge, focused on enhancing quality, simplifying tasks, and freeing time for meaningful human interaction.

The evolving role of GenAI will also bring about a shift in the skills and competencies that students must develop. Emphasis will increasingly be placed on critical thinking, problem-solving, and creativity, as students are expected to critically evaluate AI-generated outputs. Acquiring AI literacy and mastering prompt engineering will become essential for effectively using and interacting with these tools. Consequently, universities will need to equip students with these skills to prepare them for future workplaces that will increasingly demand GenAI proficiency.

Teaching and assessment practices are also set to undergo significant changes. Educators will use GenAI to automate routine tasks such as lesson planning, content creation—including presentations, exercises, and quizzes—and even the generation of initial drafts of feedback and assessments. This will reduce teacher workload and allow them to focus on complex instructional interactions. In parallel, there will be a move toward innovative and varied assessment strategies that prioritize communicative competence, critical thinking, and creativity, replacing traditional models focused solely on knowledge recall. New pedagogical approaches will emerge that integrate GenAI into problem-based learning, project-based learning, and interactive simulations.

However, these advancements will be accompanied by ongoing challenges and the need for strong ethical frameworks. Issues surrounding academic integrity, plagiarism, and misconduct will persist, requiring the development of robust detection tools and clear ethical guidelines. The potential for AI-generated content to include biases, inaccuracies, or “hallucinations” underscores the need for human oversight and mechanisms to verify content against reliable sources. Furthermore, institutions must guard against the risk that over-reliance on GenAI could undermine students’ independent thinking and problem-solving abilities. Data privacy and security concerns will also need to be addressed through transparent data management policies and robust protection strategies. Additionally, to ensure fairness, institutions must actively work to reduce the digital divide and guarantee equitable access to GenAI tools for all students.

Policy development and governance will play a critical role in guiding the responsible integration of GenAI. There will be a growing need for dynamic and comprehensive institutional policies that support innovation while upholding academic integrity and ethical standards. At the same time, research will increasingly focus on refining GenAI applications, addressing emerging challenges, and maximizing benefits across a variety of educational contexts. Longitudinal studies will be key to understanding the long-term effects of GenAI on student learning, knowledge retention, and instructional practices.

In essence, the coming decade will see GenAI deeply woven into the fabric of higher education. It will reshape how learning is delivered, acquired, and assessed, while requiring institutions to remain agile, ethically grounded, and responsive to the changing demands of technology-enhanced education.